|
|
||||||
|
BOAT REPAIRS & MODIFICATIONS
|
|
||||
New Rudder for CopernicusHere is another example in which SYDI has done a second project for the same boat. Copernicus, as you can see over in the Free-standing Masts/Copernicus article on this website, was changed from a stayed rig to a free-standing rig, a project that was quite successful. Next, owners Bryan and Carey Pollock wanted to change the rudder from the original behind-the-keel design to a new spade design.
Copernicus is an old CCA rule design with a full-length keel and attached rudder, as shown above. Bryan and Carey wanted more steering authority and performance, so they came to SYDI for a new spade rudder design with carbon fiber blade and stock. The boat had a retro-fitted hydraulic wheel steering system, and the new rudder was to go back to a tiller design. Originally, Bryan and Carey wanted to build the rudder themselves, but ultimately they chose Composite Solutions Inc. of Hingham, MA, to build the new rudder, complete with bearings, and Bryan and Carey did the installation work. What follows is the story of how we accomplished this new rudder design.
The existing rudder steered the boat OK, but there were control issues, particularly in gusty conditions, which left Bryan and Carey with a feeling of not-total control. Also, because of the inclined rudder stock, the more one pulled on the tiller, the harder is was to steer--turning a rudder with an inclined rudder always tries to pull the stern underwater. Moving the rudder aft and making the stock vertical so that there is no downward component would make steering easier and give it more authority, more efficiency.
Of course, aerofoil section thickness is important, too, for low profile drag, but the rudder stock has to fit inside the blade and be strong and stiff enough. Starting with a 14% modified GA(W) aerofoil section, a couple of iterations around the design spiral checking for strength and stiffness led me to settle on a 20% thickness section. This is not unusual. The GA(W) sections have what is known as a "drag bucket", which is a region of pronounced low drag at zero to small angles of attack. Interestingly, as the aerofoil section gets wider, the drag bucket also gets wider at slightly higher angles of attack. Also, thin aerofoils will stall at lower angles of attack than thicker aerofoils, and rudders frequently operate at large angles of attack. So, I like thick aerofoil sections for these reasons, and the figure below shows Copernicus' new rudder section shape.
Once these basics were done, I proceed with engineering the blade and stock carbon fiber laminates. I have to know what carbon fabrics, resin, and molding process are going to be used in order to assess the strength and stiffness of the finished parts through my laminate engineering. I typically check equally spaced and critical stations from the top of the stock to the tip of the blade in order to determine laminate thicknesses. Once I am satisfied with these numbers, I then have to convert the thicknesses to an actual laminate schedule that is compatible with the builder's molding and fabrication process. This whole work is done using a spreadsheet for engineering and hand calculations that end up in a graphic representation in an AutoCad drawing. The figure below is an excerpt showing the arrangement of the stock sections, their varying shape, position, and thickness, and the associated laminate schedule for the stock from the rudder construction drawing.
Once the drawings were done, they were sent to a selection of builders, and the owners ultimately chose Composite Solutions of Hingham, MA. The Pollocks arranged the contract separately, and I remained in contact with Composite Solutions to work out additional construction details. Our original thought was to use neck and carrier bearings from Tides Marine in Florida, but Composite Solutions had used Danish Jeffa bearings successfully before. We deferred to their choice which has worked out well. The completed rudder was shipped to the Pollocks needing only the final primer and painting of anti-fouling paint to match Copernicus' bottom.
The entire project was a great success. It is perhaps fitting that I quote Bryan Pollock in one of his emails reporting on Copernicus' performance: From Bryan: Needless to say sailing qualities have of course improved. Things such as boat speed at all wind strengths, tacking on a dime are noticeably improved. At higher wind speeds and wave heights the boat is nowhere near that old feeling of being slightly out of control at nine or ten knots boat speed as it did before with the old contraption. Light air was a revelation. We completely baffled a Jeanneau 45 in the light stuff (2 to 5 knots) upwind. I have to admit even if I do say so myself that I can usually make good tactical choices in those conditions, so a lot of that particular trouncing may have been that as opposed to any qualities the boat may possess. And: Maneuvering in tight quarters under power as long as we are in forward is a real treat. What a notion, actually knowing by feel where the rudder angle is and what it is affecting instantaneously as opposed to the old time delay with the contraption we had before. Backing up is a whole other story, however. It is absolutely horrible. There is every indication that what ever direction the boat decides to take is entirely based on the whim of a lesser and obviously bitter pagan god, who, I might add, really should have better things to do. Tentative tests (remember all this testing under power involves expensive marinas and boats in the near vicinity) seem to suggest that keeping the main rudder straight and instead using the Hydrovane rudder to steer backwards is showing a bit more promise. I will have to rig a tiller extension on the Hydrovane to make more accurate experiments.
The success of designing, building, and fitting Copernicus' new rudder was due to a number of things, but most importantly, I think, to Bryan and Carey's realistic expectation of budget ($4,000 for design, and just under $12,000 for the rudder itself, not to mention painting of the cockpit and bottom, yard bills, and the cost of their own labor). I also give just praise of the quality of workmanship to Composite Solutions Inc. They were not the cheapest builder by any means, but you get what you pay for. They have excellent building skills and working with them is a joy. You can reach them at their website here: Composite Solutions Inc.. If you have a similar project and would like SYDI to do the design work, I would be happy to hear from you, and you may use the Contact Us link below. |
Home | News | About
Us
| Boat
Designs
| Free
Standing Masts | Repairs / Modifications |
|
||||||
![]() |